Appendectomy: laparoscopy is not always the best option
December 29, 2010 by Raquel
Filed under HEALTHCARE
I had my appendix taken out laparoscopically in 1998. What was expected to be a simple operation caused me a lot of pain that persisted for a long, long time. Four years later, I had my thyroids taken and shared a room with a lady who, too, had laparoscopic appendectomy and had similar problems as I did.
The laparoscopic surgical technique became popular in the 1990s and is now the “gold standard” for simple procedures inside the body cavity such appendectomy. Here is how it works:
The abdomen in inflated with air, and a very small camera is inserted through a tiny incision. This enables the surgeon to control the tiny surgical instruments also inserted through tiny holes in the body cavity.
Compared to open surgery, laparoscopy is minimally invasive, causes less scarring and minimizes the risk of infection since the body cavity is less exposed to the air. The surgical wound heals fast and the patient is up and running in no time.
However, researchers at the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) report that there are some patients wherein laparoscopy may actually not be the best option.
According to study author Dr. John Monson, head of the Division of Colorectal Surgery at URMC.
A small number of laparoscopic patients suffer from what is called “deep infection” inside the body cavity and these patients take months to heal and get back on feet, incurring tremendous costs.
Monson continues to explain:
The researchers tried to identify the risk factors that make some patients suitable or unsuitable for having a laparoscopic procedure. They report that patients with a certain profile are more likely to suffer from deep infection than others. These “high-risk patients” are
- Male
- Of older age
- Smoker
- Diabetic
In this day and age of “personalized” medicine, doctors are advised to assessment their patients for suitability and risks for this seemingly simple procedure.
credit-n.ru/zaymyi-next.html
